Tag Archives: construct a viable argument and critique the reasoning of others

The Circumference of a Cylinder

We talked about pi earlier this week in geometry, and we used Andrew Stadel’s water bottle question to start.

I’m not one to pull of the wager that Andrew used (unfortunately, my students will agree that I am a bit too serious for that), but we still had an interesting conversation.

Compare the circumference and height of the water bottle.

1 2016-02-12 12.56.07

Here’s what they estimated by themselves.

2 Screen Shot 2016-02-08 at 9.18.12 AM

Then they faced left if they thought height > circumference, straight if =, and right if height < circumference. (I saw Andrew lead this at CMC-South year before last … I certainly didn’t think of it myself.) They found someone who agreed with their answer, and practiced I can construct a viable argument and critique the reasoning of others.

3 2016-02-08 09.05.36

Next they found a second person who agreed, and practiced I can construct a viable argument and critique the reasoning of others again. (By this time, we decided it was easier to raise 1, 2, or 3 fingers based on answer choice rather than turn a certain direction as it was a challenge for some to see someone turned the same direction.) Finally, they found someone who disagreed, and practiced I can construct a viable argument and critique the reasoning of others.

4 2016-02-08 09.07.26

I sent the poll again.

It didn’t change much.

5 Screen Shot 2016-02-08 at 9.18.26 AM

So without discussion, I sent a poll with a bit more context … a cylindrical can holding 3 tennis balls. Would the can of tennis balls help them reason abstractly and quantitatively?

6 02-12-2016 Image001

Apparently not.

Here’s what they thought by themselves.

7 Screen Shot 2016-02-08 at 9.18.32 AM.png

And here’s what they thought after talking with someone else.

8 Screen Shot 2016-02-08 at 9.18.39 AM.png

The clock was ticking. I still wanted us to talk about pi. I asked someone who correctly answered to share her thinking with the rest of the class to convince them. And we used string to show that the water bottle circumference was, in fact, longer than its height.

I intended to follow up with this Quick Poll. But I was in a hurry and forgot. Maybe next year.

9 02-25-2016 Image001.jpg

You can find more number sense ideas from Andrew here.

I’ll look forward to hearing about how they play out in your classroom, as the journey continues …


Tags: , , , , , ,

Popcorn Picker + #ShowYourWork

Towards the end of our geometry course last year, we focused on students being able to say:

I can show my work.

How often do our students understand what we mean when we say, “show your work”?

Jill Gough’s Show Your Work learning progression has been an important addition to our classroom.

Level 4: I can show more than one way to find a solution to the problem.

Level 3: I can describe or illustrate how I arrived at a solution in a way that the reader understands without talking to me.

Level 2: I can find a correct solution to the problem.

Level 1: I can ask questions to help me work toward a solution to the problem.

A correct solution isn’t enough … we want the reader (and sometimes grader) to understand our solution without having to ask any questions.

We continue to use Dan Meyer’s Popcorn Picker 3-Act, even though I keep thinking we shouldn’t need to do this in high school. The Quick Poll results, however, provide evidence that we aren’t wasting our time.

1 09-11-2015 Image001

2 Screen Shot 2015-04-27 at 10.01.47 AM

You can read more about how the 3-Act lesson played out in last year’s post.

3 2015-04-27 09.16.40-1 4 2015-04-27 09.18.08

My purpose for posting about the lesson again is to consider the value added when we ask students to practice “show your work” and provide students the opportunity to give other students feedback on what they’ve shown … when we provide students an opportunity to practice SMP3, “I can construct a viable argument and critique the reasoning of others”.

We used the “I like …, I wish …, What if (or I wonder) …” protocol for providing feedback.

5 2015-04-27 12.50.346 2015-04-27 12.50.39 7 2015-04-27 12.50.45 8 2015-04-27 12.50.51 9 2015-04-27 12.50.58

Kato Nims recently posted Illuminating Success and Growth, where she shares her students’ first attempts at giving feedback to each other this year. She writes, “It is clear to me that as our work together continues that it will be important for me to model how to give effective feedback so that we can all benefit from the unique perspectives that are represented in our classroom.”

Some of the feedback that my students gave each other is helpful, but more of it is not. How do we teach students to give productive feedback to each other? Would my giving feedback on the feedback have been helpful? At what point have we spent too much time on this activity and need to call it “done”? But then how often am I so focused on teaching content that I neglect to provide students the opportunity to grow as learners? Isn’t learning how to give feedback important for all of us? The tasks we choose are so important … which ones will further both our content and our practice learning goals?

And so the journey continues … with many more questions than answers.


Tags: , ,

#AskDontTell: Pythagorean Relationships

I have been invited to write a few posts for NCTM’s Mathematics Teacher Blog: Joy and Inspiration in the Mathematics Classroom. You can read my second post here. While you’re there, be sure to catch up on any other posts you haven’t read. There are some great ones by Matt Enlow, Chris Harrow, and Kathy Erickson.

My post starts with a quote by one of my students: A few weeks ago, I overheard one student telling another, “Will you help me figure this out? Don’t just tell me how to do it.” How many of the students in our care are thinking the same thing? How often do we tell them how to do mathematics? How often do we provide them with “Ask, Don’t Tell” opportunities to learn mathematics?

After reading the post, John Golden tweeted the following:

John had no idea that I happen to be reading Creating Cultures of Thinking by Ron Ritchart (you can preview the first chapter at the link), and so the language that he chose to use was timely. I’m deep in the midst of thinking about how we teach our students to learn … about the cultures that we are creating with our students.

Ritchart quotes Lev Vygotsky: “Children grow into the intellectual life of those around them.” And then says himself, “… learning to learn is an apprenticeship in which we don’t so much learn from others as we learn with others in the midst of authentic activities.” [p. 20]

Ritchart later asks, “What difference does it make if a teachers asks, ‘Is your work done?’ or ‘Where are you in your learning?’” [p. 44]

I wonder what you think. Does it matter whether we ask our students whether they are finished with their work or where they are in their learning? I think it might. Focusing on the learning instead of the work creates a culture of thinking. Focusing on the learning instead of the work causes students to say, “Will you help me figure this out? Don’t just tell me how to do it.”

And so the journey of creating cultures of thinking continues …


Tags: , ,

Which One Doesn’t Belong?

You’ve seen “which one is different” before.

(I first remember seeing this particular question from John Bament at a T3 session in 2014, although he might have gotten it from somewhere else. He sent it to the participants as a Quick Poll and showed us our quite varied results.)

1 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 11.38.42 AM

You’ve seen “Odd One Out” before.

These two images come from the Mathematics Assessment Project formative assessment lesson on Comparing Investments.

3 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 5.46.26 AM 4 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 5.46.38 AM

I observed this lesson in a classroom a few weeks ago. It didn’t bother students that more than one answer can be correct, and they naturally explained why they chose what they did without the teacher even having to prompt them with “How did you get that?” or “Why?”

My coworker and I introduced Christopher Danielson’s Which One Doesn’t Belong to our beginning K-2 teachers recently. They began to think immediately about how they could do something similar with language as well as math. (And they were thrilled to learn something in PD that they could immediately take back to their classrooms.)

When I recently learned about Mary’s Which One Doesn’t Belong site, I decided to spend some time on it during our recent Math PLC meeting.

We started with a page from Christopher’s shape book. Our assistant principal (former history teacher) was thrilled to be able to immediately participate in our discussion. (How many of our students feel the same when we offer them low-floor, high-ceiling tasks?)

5 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 11.39.46 AM

We did a number WODB (one teacher fist-pumped another assistant principal when they figured out that 9 didn’t belong since the sum of its digits isn’t 7). Thanks, Pam!

6 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 11.18.38 AM

Then we moved to Rachel Fruin’s geometry Which One Doesn’t Belong. Our history teacher-turned assistant principal was still able to participate. She didn’t have the same vocabulary that the rest of the math teachers in our department had when stating why one doesn’t belong, but she learned some math vocabulary and we learned to see the images through different eyes during our shared experience.

6-1 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 11.42.10 AM

We ended our PLC with Hunter Patton’s Graphs & Equations 7.

7 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 11.25.12 AM

I recently heard that one measure of the success of professional development is whether the teacher’s practice changes as a result of what was learned. (Another part to this would of course be how long the teacher’s practice changes … one lesson? A few lessons? Or permanent change in lessons?) So I was thrilled to notice that the teacher with whom I share a room gave her precalculus students a WODB to try at the end of their opener later that day.

8 Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 11.31.09 AM

They were studying rational functions. Which one doesn’t belong?

Before I knew it, students were in different corners of the room based on their initial responses.

9 IMG_1625

They shared thoughts with each other before sharing with the whole class.

10 Screen Shot 2015-03-30 at 8.17.37 PM

I tried the geometry WODB with my geometry students yesterday. I asked them to send me their response so that I could decide whether moving to one of the four corners of the room would be worthwhile. I asked bottom left to gather, bottom right to gather, and then top left & top right to gather. Why doesn’t your choice belong?

11 Screen Shot 2015-03-30 at 9.28.05 AM

12 Screen Shot 2015-03-30 at 9.28.37 AM

Now work on your mathematical flexibility. Instead of being satisfied with one way to answer, find multiple responses.

Find a reason that each one doesn’t belong, and let me know when you do by selecting that choice on the new Quick Poll (now multiple response).

13 Screen Shot 2015-03-30 at 9.38.27 AM

Now sorted by individual responses so I can see which students need support:

14 Screen Shot 2015-03-30 at 9.38.38 AM

I’ve offered problem solving points for students who create their own WODB, and I look forward to seeing the results. Thank you, Mary, for creating a place for us to share and learn together … for creating a site that our teachers were able to immediately incorporate into their own learning and their students’ learning.


Tags: , , , , ,

Half of a Square

Sketch a smaller square inside the given square so that the area of the smaller square is half the area of the larger square. Write an explanation to convince another that your new, smaller square is truly half the area of the original square.

1 Square

I’m sure that I didn’t write this question, but I don’t remember from where it came.

What would your students get right?

What misconceptions might they have?

I was surprised at some of my students’ misconceptions (and miscalculations) and explanations.

2 Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 12.56.54 PM

3 Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 12.57.49 PM 4 Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 12.59.22 PM 5 Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 12.59.57 PM 6 Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 1.00.34 PM 7 Screen Shot 2015-01-28 at 1.00.55 PM

Measuring errors.

Calculation errors. Lots of “simple” calculation errors: Half of 36 is 16. Half of 25 is 13.25. Half of 5 is 3.5.
More measuring errors.

Square vs. rectangle errors.

And someone getting at the immeasurability of irrational numbers.

The test was summative. But even though the test was summative in my gradebook, I can still use the responses to inform the learning experiences that I give my students in the future. And so I will, as the journey continues …


Tags: , ,

Conditional Statements & Instructional Adjustments

I wrote recently about A-S-N-T-F.

I also wrote recently about what happens when students don’t recognize that a statement and its converse are different. We explicitly worked on conditional statements after that lesson.

So we defined converse/inverse/contrapositive/biconditional using symbolic logic, and then students decided which was which for a given conditional statement: If a shape has four sides, then the shape is a rectangle.

1 Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 9.51.12 AM

What happens when you change which statement is the conditional statement?

2 Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 9.51.19 AM

Again, students figured out which was which using the “new” conditional.

3 Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 9.51.23 AM

We formatively assessed their progress on conditional statements:

4 Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 9.23.40 AM

And then we were ready to start thinking about the truth value of the statements.

5 Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 9.23.21 AM

Or maybe we weren’t ready actually ready, but we started thinking about the truth value anyway.

I never click on the student results for a Quick Poll in front of the students for the first time. My projector remote is an extension of my hand (except when I’ve carelessly laid it down and can’t find it), and so while students are working, I freeze the screen to look at the results and decide whether to make an instructional adjustment and if so, what instructional adjustment to make before I show the results to the students. Sometimes (as is the case in the contrapositive QP above), I have time to go talk to students who have answered incorrectly to clear up misconceptions while other students are still working. Sometimes (as is the case with this question), I deselect “Show Correct Answer” before displaying the results to students.

A student usually asks, “So who is correct?”

To which I reply, “So who is correct?”

I asked students to find someone in the room at a different table who answered differently. Convince them you are correct. Then let them convince you they are correct. (Practice construct a viable argument and critique the reasoning of others.) Then send in your answer again.

6 Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 9.24.52 AM

Sometimes the responses change to 100% correct. Sometimes they don’t. And so I have to decide my next instructional adjustment. Do we have time to try this again? Or is the clock ticking more quickly?

My decision this time was to have a student come draw her counterexample.

What do we mean when we say two angles are supplementary?

Does that counterexample convince those who say the statement is true?

What if we are evaluating whether this statement is A-S-N?

7 Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 9.41.59 AM

And so the journey continues, grateful for technology that gives every student in my classroom a voice – from the quietest to the loudest – so that I can make more informed decisions for when to make instructional adjustments.

Leave a comment

Posted by on November 29, 2014 in Angles & Triangles, Geometry


Tags: , , , , ,

What’s My Rule

Instead of having a whole lesson of What’s My Rule explorations, we are adding one exploration to each bellringer during our unit on Rigid Motions. From yesterday:

Screen Shot 2014-08-21 at 5.45.50 AM

Students move point Z and observe how W follows. Z is mapped to W according to some rule that the students are trying to determine

I’ve written about this exploration before, so I want to focus on what was different this year.

Students constructed viable arguments and critiqued the reasoning of others. We are learning how to attend to precision, so we were lenient in giving credit to responses for which the oral explanation helped us make sense of the written explanation.

Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 10.06.34 AM Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 10.06.50 AM Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 10.06.59 AM Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 10.07.08 AM

One team wrote that if you added something to Z and subtracted something from W, then the points would map onto one another. I wouldn’t have worded what they were trying to say like they did. But they were getting at some important mathematics. Ultimately, they were trying to convey that Z and W are the same distance from the origin. We constructed a circle with the origin as the center and Z as one of the points on the circle and noticed that both Z and W always lie on the circle.

Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 9.01.25 AM

A few other students said that the rule was to reflect Z over the line y=x to get W. Does that always work? We looked back and decided it wasn’t always true. When is it true? When does (x,y)→(-x,-y) also represent a reflection about the line y=x?

Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 9.04.25 AM

Screen Shot 2014-08-21 at 9.41.42 AM

Others thought that the rule was to reflect Z over the line y=-x to get W. Does that always work? We looked back and decided it wasn’t always true. When is it true? When does (x,y)→(-x,-y) also represent a reflection about the line y=-x?

Other students noticed that we could describe the rule using a rotation of Z 180˚ about the origin.

No one noticed that we could reflect Z about the x-axis and then about the y-axis. So what happens when no one notices something we want them to notice? I could have moved on. It wouldn’t have been detrimental to my students learning of mathematics if they didn’t know that. But I didn’t. Instead I asked whether there was a reflection that we could use to map Z onto W. I gave students just seconds to think alone and then time to talk with their teams. I monitored their team talk. 5 teams said that we could reflect Z about the perpendicular bisector of segment ZW to map Z onto W. Yes. Not what I was expecting … but absolutely true.

Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 9.14.19 AM

One team said that we could reflect Z about the line y=x and then about the line y=-x to map Z onto W. Oh…we can reflect Z about y=x and then y=-x? How can you show that?

What happens when you reflect (x,y) about y=x? (y,x)

What happens when you reflect (y,x) about y=-x? (-x,-y)

Is there another sequence of reflections that will map Z onto W?

Reflecting about y=-x and then y=x.

Is there another sequence of reflections that will map Z onto W?

Teams worked together – and after another few minutes, they figure out that reflecting about y=0 and then x=0 would work. Or reflecting about x=0 and then y=0.

Screen Shot 2014-08-20 at 9.23.16 AM

And then we were called to the cafeteria for school pictures.

And then a student came up to me in the line for school pictures and asked whether there would be an infinite number of pairs of lines about which we could reflect Z onto W.

Are there an infinite number of pairs of lines that will work?

What relationship do the pairs of lines have that we found?

y=x and y=-x; y=0 and x=0

What is significant about the pairs of lines?

After a few more questions, the students around us in line for pictures noted that the lines are perpendicular.

So if we reflected Z about y=2x, then about what other line would we need to reflect Z’ to get W?

Screen Shot 2014-08-21 at 9.29.03 AM

I will be the first to admit both that of course all of this makes sense mathematically, and also that I’ve never thought about it before. And so the journey continues … ever grateful for the students with whom I learn.


Thanks to Michael Pershan for sharing Transformation Rules.


Posted by on August 21, 2014 in Coordinate Geometry, Geometry, Rigid Motions


Tags: , , , , , ,